Hackney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hackney v. State

68 S.W.2d 495, 125 Tex. Crim. 353, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 91

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 14, 1934

DocketNo. 16683.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 S.W.2d 495 (Hackney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hackney v. State, 68 S.W.2d 495, 125 Tex. Crim. 353, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 91 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception.

In the absence of the evidence the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be appraised.

We have perceived no error in the procedure which would justify a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI