Hackney v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hackney v. State

158 S.E.2d 239, 223 Ga. 802, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 704

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 22, 1967

Docket24360

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 S.E.2d 239 (Hackney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hackney v. State, 158 S.E.2d 239, 223 Ga. 802, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 704 (Ga. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Admand, Presiding. Justice.

The grand jury of Twiggs County returned an indictment on June 26, 1967, charging William Frank Hackney with the offense of “refusal to drive a motor vehicle on State scales” for weighing after being ordered and directed to do so by an employee of the State Highway Department. The indictment sought to charge a violation of Section 2 of Ga. L. 1960, pp. 1122, 1123 (Code Ann. § 68-406.2).

The defendant’s general demurrer asserted that the portion of Section 2 of said 1960 Act that provides if the operator of a motor vehicle sought to be weighed “shall refuse to stop upon proper order or to drive the vehicle upon the scales as directed,” he shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $200, is violative of Art. I, Sec. I, Par. VI of the Georgia Constitution (Code Ann. § 2-106) which provides: “No person shall be compelled to give testimony tending in any manner to criminate himself.”

This demurrer was overruled, and upon the trial before the judge, both parties consenting to waive trial by jury, the defend *803 ant was found guilty and fined $50. In his appeal the defendant assigns error on the order overruling his demurrer and the sentence imposed.

This court in June of 1964, in Aldrich v. State, 220 Ga. 132 (137 SE2d 463) held: “That portion of Ga. L. 1960, pp. 1122, 1123 (Code Ann. § 68-406.2) which requires an operator of a motor vehicle to drive it upon the scales when ordered to do so by a State agent, or failing, to pay a fine of $200, is, in view of the provisions of Ga. L. 1941, p. 449, as amended (Ga. L. 1951, p. 772; 1955, p. 392; 1956, p. 83; 1959, p. 27; ■Code Arm. §§ 68-405 and 68-9921), making the operator of a vehicle weighing more than therein provided, guilty of a crime, offensive to Art. I, Sec. I, Par. VI of the Constitution of 1945, and is void. It was error to overrule the demurrer to the accusation charging the accused with a violation of Ga. L. 1960, p. 1122, supra.” It thus appears that at the time the indictment was returned in this case there was no law in existence which made it an offense for one to refuse to drive a motor vehicle on State scales for the purpose of weighing when ordered to do so by an employee of the State Highway Department. The indictment was void as were all subsequent proceedings. Green v. Hutchinson, 128 Ga. 379 (57 SE 353). The court erred in not sustaining the general demurrer and quashing the indictment.

The request to overrule Aldrich v. State, 220 Ga. 132, supra, is denied.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Admand, Presiding. Justice.

The grand jury of Twiggs County returned an indictment on June 26, 1967, charging William Frank Hackney with the offense of “refusal to drive a motor vehicle on State scales” for weighing after being ordered and directed to do so by an employee of the State Highway Department. The indictment sought to charge a violation of Section 2 of Ga. L. 1960, pp. 1122, 1123 (Code Ann. § 68-406.2).

The defendant’s general demurrer asserted that the portion of Section 2 of said 1960 Act that provides if the operator of a motor vehicle sought to be weighed “shall refuse to stop upon proper order or to drive the vehicle upon the scales as directed,” he shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $200, is violative of Art. I, Sec. I, Par. VI of the Georgia Constitution (Code Ann. § 2-106) which provides: “No person shall be compelled to give testimony tending in any manner to criminate himself.”

This demurrer was overruled, and upon the trial before the judge, both parties consenting to waive trial by jury, the defend *803 ant was found guilty and fined $50. In his appeal the defendant assigns error on the order overruling his demurrer and the sentence imposed.

This court in June of 1964, in Aldrich v. State, 220 Ga. 132 (137 SE2d 463) held: “That portion of Ga. L. 1960, pp. 1122, 1123 (Code Ann. § 68-406.2) which requires an operator of a motor vehicle to drive it upon the scales when ordered to do so by a State agent, or failing, to pay a fine of $200, is, in view of the provisions of Ga. L. 1941, p. 449, as amended (Ga. L. 1951, p. 772; 1955, p. 392; 1956, p. 83; 1959, p. 27; ■Code Arm. §§ 68-405 and 68-9921), making the operator of a vehicle weighing more than therein provided, guilty of a crime, offensive to Art. I, Sec. I, Par. VI of the Constitution of 1945, and is void. It was error to overrule the demurrer to the accusation charging the accused with a violation of Ga. L. 1960, p. 1122, supra.” It thus appears that at the time the indictment was returned in this case there was no law in existence which made it an offense for one to refuse to drive a motor vehicle on State scales for the purpose of weighing when ordered to do so by an employee of the State Highway Department. The indictment was void as were all subsequent proceedings. Green v. Hutchinson, 128 Ga. 379 (57 SE 353). The court erred in not sustaining the general demurrer and quashing the indictment.

The request to overrule Aldrich v. State, 220 Ga. 132, supra, is denied.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 S.E.2d 239, 223 Ga. 802, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackney-v-state-ga-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack