Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Hackney v. Hackney

Hackney v. Hackney

199 So. 755, 145 Fla. 470, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 725
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 755 (Hackney v. Hackney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hackney v. Hackney, 199 So. 755, 145 Fla. 470, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 725 (Fla. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From a study of the file in the above case, no reversible error has appeared, therefore, the decree of the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not partipating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 755, 145 Fla. 470, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackney-v-hackney-fla-1941.