Hackley v. Hastie

3 Johns. 253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hackley v. Hastie. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 Johns. 252
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1808·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The entering of a rule nisi for judgment, cannot prejudice the defendant, and if not done on the fourth day of term, may produce inconvenience to the plaintiff, in case a new trial should be refused. No judgment can be entered up, until the motion for a new trial ip decided.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hackley v. Hastie, 3 Johns. 253 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

3 Johns. 253 (Hackley v. Hastie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.