Hackley v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Hackley v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 551, 58 McGrath 454

DecidedNovember 18, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 551 (Hackley v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hackley v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 551, 58 McGrath 454 (Mich. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

To vacate an order striking from the files a paper _ executed, by Harriet P. Hacldey, waiving all errors and exceptions in a matter which had been tried in the Circuit Court, in which she was a party, waiving the right to move for a new trial and consenting that the verdict and judgment against her should stand as final and conclusive.

Granted November 18, 1885.

Harriet P. Hacldey filed a petition in the Probate Court claiming to be the widow of Porter Hacldey, and asking for an allowance. The court made an order granting an allowance. On appeal a jury found that she was not the widow. Pending the time fixed for settlement of a bill of exceptions, the paper inferred to was signed and filed. Afterwards a member of the firm of attorneys who had appeared for claimant, moved the.court to-strike the paper from the files, alleging that he held an assignment of the interest of Harriet P. Hacldey in the decedent estate and that the stipulation was a fraud upon his rights. The court below granted the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To vacate an order striking from the files a paper _ executed, by Harriet P. Hacldey, waiving all errors and exceptions in a matter which had been tried in the Circuit Court, in which she was a party, waiving the right to move for a new trial and consenting that the verdict and judgment against her should stand as final and conclusive.

Granted November 18, 1885.

Harriet P. Hacldey filed a petition in the Probate Court claiming to be the widow of Porter Hacldey, and asking for an allowance. The court made an order granting an allowance. On appeal a jury found that she was not the widow. Pending the time fixed for settlement of a bill of exceptions, the paper inferred to was signed and filed. Afterwards a member of the firm of attorneys who had appeared for claimant, moved the.court to-strike the paper from the files, alleging that he held an assignment of the interest of Harriet P. Hacldey in the decedent estate and that the stipulation was a fraud upon his rights. The court below granted the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 551, 58 McGrath 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackley-v-circuit-judge-mich-1885.