Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith

6 A.2d 486, 125 N.J. Eq. 482, 1939 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 88

DecidedApril 21, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.2d 486 (Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith, 6 A.2d 486, 125 N.J. Eq. 482, 1939 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 88 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We have carefully examined the proofs and the arguments of counsel and the memorandum filed by the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause, and we are of the opinion that his findings of fact and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The order confirming the sale in foreclosure is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eaffertt, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

We have carefully examined the proofs and the arguments of counsel and the memorandum filed by the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause, and we are of the opinion that his findings of fact and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The order confirming the sale in foreclosure is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eaffertt, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.2d 486, 125 N.J. Eq. 482, 1939 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackettstown-national-bank-v-smith-nj-1939.