Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith

6 A.2d 486, 125 N.J. Eq. 482, 1939 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 88

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 21, 1939·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We have carefully examined the proofs and the arguments of counsel and the memorandum filed by the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause, and we are of the opinion that his findings of fact and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The order confirming the sale in foreclosure is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eaffertt, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

We have carefully examined the proofs and the arguments of counsel and the memorandum filed by the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause, and we are of the opinion that his findings of fact and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The order confirming the sale in foreclosure is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eaffertt, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith, 6 A.2d 486, 125 N.J. Eq. 482, 1939 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 88 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

6 A.2d 486 (Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.