Hackett v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
This text of 27 Misc. 839 (Hackett v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The evidence '■shows that in crossing defendant’s tracks the plaintiff exercised 'due caution. ' The injuries complained of were severe. The verdict was a reasonable one, These injuries were caused by defendant’s negligence in turning the curve at Fifty-third street, and Plinth avenue. The evidence shows that defendant’s car was going very fast, in fact,, unreasonably fast,, thus running down plaintiff and injuring her.
Present: Fitzsimoys, Oh. J.; O’Dwyer and Schuchmay, J J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Misc. 839, 58 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackett-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nynyccityct-1899.