Hackett v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.
This text of 51 Colo. 322 (Hackett v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
By stipulation of counsel of respective parties, this cause was submitted for final decision upon copies of the briefs filed and used in the case of Hackett et al. v. Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company, 48 Colo. 178; 109 Pac. 965. It appears from this stipulation and from the record that the parties, and the questions involved in the two actions are, in principle, the same. The judgment of affirmance in that case requires like action in this. Upon the authority of that decision, therefore, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Colo. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackett-v-larimer-weld-irrigation-co-colo-1911.