Hackett v. King

88 Mass. 58
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The plaintiff has no legal ground of exception to the instructions that were given to the jury instead of those for which he asked. The instructions which the court gave stated the law correctly.

But the exception to the admission of paroi evidence to prove the issuing of a warrant against the plaintiff, and his arrest thereon, must be sustained. The warrant could be legally proved only by producing it or a verified copy of it, unless upon the defendant’s showing that neither it nor such copy of it could be produced New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hackett v. King, 88 Mass. 58 (Mass. 1863).

88 Mass. 58 (Hackett v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langdale v. Menendez
7 Mass. L. Rptr. 556 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 1997)
McGann v. Allen
134 A. 810 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1926)
Stembridge v. Wright
124 S.E. 115 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Delany v. Lindsay
46 Pa. Super. 26 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)