Hackett v. Ford
This text of 20 Ky. 88 (Hackett v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
To have execution of a judgment which Ford had recovered inf lie Madison circuit court against Hackett. the former sued out a scire facias, against the latter, returnable to the Mai eh term. 1825. Upon this scire facias the sheriff of Madison returned Hackett to be no inhabitant of his county, and not found.
On the 19th of April. 1825, an alias scire facias was sued out against Hackett, returnable to the next March term, and upon which the sheriff again returned that Hackett was no inhabitant of Madison county, and not found.
At the June term, 1825, the cause was called, and Hackett failing to appear, judgment was rendered against him.
The judgment cannot be sustained. The scire, facias which last issued, is most clearly insufficient to authorize judgment against Hackett, without his [89]*89having appeared. Instead of being made returnable to the next term of the court, after its date, as it should regularly have been, the scire facias which bears date in April, 1825, commanded the sheriff to warn Hackett to appear at the next succeeding March term; and not only so, but before the March term, at the June term preceding it, the judgment was taken by default against him.
The judgment must he reversed with cost, the cause remanded to the court below, and further proceedings had not inconsistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ky. 88, 4 T.B. Mon. 88, 1826 Ky. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackett-v-ford-kyctapp-1826.