Hackett-Addison v. Harrington

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 AMILLIYON R. HACKETT-ADDISON, Case No. 25-cv-03513-JSC Plaintiff, 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 10 HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants. 11 12 On August 4, 2025, Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim screened Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint 13 and dismissed for failure to present a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was granted 28 14 days to file an amended complaint, and warned that if he did not do so the case would be 15 dismissed. The case was reassigned to the undersigned District Judge.1 Plaintiff has not filed an 16 amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or shown cause why not. This case is 17 accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 18 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does not 19 amend, further district court determination is necessary). 20 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 22 Dated: October 9, 2025 23 24 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY 25 United States District Judge 26 27