Hackenberg v. Artesian Pools of East Fla., Inc.
This text of 440 So. 2d 475 (Hackenberg v. Artesian Pools of East Fla., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wilhelm HACKENBERG and Ingrid Hackenberg, Appellants,
v.
ARTESIAN POOLS OF EAST FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Gregory J. McDole, Daytona Beach, for appellants.
William F. Poole, IV, of William (Fred) Poole, IV, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
This is an "appeal" from an appeal to the circuit court after judgment in the county court. Of course, there is no such appeal. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny it. Further, we grant appellee's motion for attorney fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1981) and remand the matter to the circuit *476 court to hold a hearing to take evidence and assess a reasonable amount for those fees.
It is so ordered.
DAUKSCH, COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 So. 2d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackenberg-v-artesian-pools-of-east-fla-inc-fladistctapp-1983.