Hacked v. Municipal Court
This text of 209 Cal. 780 (Hacked v. Municipal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This is a proceeding in mandate similar in all essential particulars to the preceding cases of Harris v. Municipal Court et al. (L. A. No. 11787), ante, p. 55 [285 Pac. 699], and Gutterman v. Municipal Court et al. (L, A. No. 11605), ante, p. 65 [295 Pac. 703], this day [781]*781decided. The complaint against the petitioner for usury, a misdemeanor, was filed in the respondent court on September 23, 1927, and the warrant was served on April 18, 1929, and nothing was done by the prosecution in the meantime to bring the ease on for trial. Proceedings similar to those in the other cases were taken in the respondent court to bring about a dismissal of the action with like result. On the authority of those cases the peremptory writ of mandamus is ordered issued as prayed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 Cal. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hacked-v-municipal-court-cal-1930.