Hack v. State
574 So. 2d 1231, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1528, 1991 WL 22983
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 574 So. 2d 1231 (Hack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hack v. State, 574 So. 2d 1231, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1528, 1991 WL 22983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We affirm the order of probation imposed by the lower court and direct the court to hold a hearing on restitution on appellant’s motion. See A.P. v. State, 558 So.2d 519 (Fla.1990).
As in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COM[1232]*1232MITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Banegas v. State
586 So. 2d 339 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
574 So. 2d 1231, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1528, 1991 WL 22983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hack-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.