Hack v. Shovlin
This text of 101 A. 956 (Hack v. Shovlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned trial judge instructed the jury to find as a fact whether, the written notice of the appellee to the appellant of January 5, 1914, was an absolute abandonment of the contract by the former, or merely that he would not prosecute the work until, upon a re-estimate for December, he was paid what was due Mm. The finding of the jury was that he had not absolutely abandoned the contract, and, as the appellee did not tender payment to him of the amount due on the re-estimate of January 7th, he was entitled to recover. This was the correct view of the court below in discharging the rule for a new trial, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A. 956, 258 Pa. 188, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hack-v-shovlin-pa-1917.