Hachenberger v. Hachenberger

135 So. 3d 413, 2014 WL 470639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1615
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 2014
DocketNo. 5D13-4450
StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 3d 413 (Hachenberger v. Hachenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hachenberger v. Hachenberger, 135 So. 3d 413, 2014 WL 470639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1615 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COHEN, J.

As in Chace v. Loisel, — So.3d - (Fla. 5th DCA 2014), the trial judge initiated ex parte communications with a party through a Facebook “friend” request. For the reasons expressed in Chace, we grant the petition in the instant case. As in Chace, we do not anticipate the need to issue a formal writ.

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 3d 413, 2014 WL 470639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hachenberger-v-hachenberger-fladistctapp-2014.