Haburn v. Kilby
This text of Haburn v. Kilby (Haburn v. Kilby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1785
JAMES D. HABURN; STEFANIE A. RODEN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JOHN F. KILBY; THE BANK OF FINCASTLE; JOHN/JANE DOE, Owners/Co-owners,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cv-00336-jct)
Submitted: February 11, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Haburn, Stefanie A. Roden, Appellants Pro Se. C. Jacob Ladenheim, Fincastle, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James D. Haburn and Stefanie A. Roden appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action against
John F. Kilby and the Bank of Fincastle. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Haburn v. Kilby, No.
7:04-cv-00336-jct (W.D. Va. June 11, 2008). Additionally, we
deny Appellants’ motion for production of transcripts as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Haburn v. Kilby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haburn-v-kilby-ca4-2009.