Habr v. RXMAPPER, LLC

District Court, N.D. California·Decided February 21, 2025·No. 4:23-cv-02061·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDWAR HABR, ET AL., 7 Case No. 4:23-cv-2061-YGR Plaintiffs, 8 v. PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 2 RE: PRETRIAL 9 CONFERENCE RXMAPPER, LLC, ET AL., 10 Defendants. 11

12 In light of the filings and the pretrial conference held on February 19, 2025, the Court 13 enters the following additional pretrial orders: 14 1. Trial Date and Schedule: The trial of this matter is rescheduled to proceed in 15 Courtroom 1 on August 18, 2025. Jury selection shall occur on August 15, 2025. Trial itself shall 16 commence daily at 8:30 a.m. Counsel shall arrive in court early enough to proceed promptly at 17 8:00 a.m. with the Court to discuss issues outside the presence of the jury. Trial schedule will be 18 Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 1:40 p.m. with two twenty-minute breaks. Additional 19 time may be scheduled for matters outside the presence of the jury as necessary and determined by 20 the Court. Sidebars are not permitted. Counsel should be prepared to anticipate issues so that they 21 may be addressed outside of normal trial hours. In this regard, Counsel should also be prepared to 22 reconvene with the Court after the Court’s standing calendars which normally begin at 2:00 p.m. 23 2. The parties shall each be afforded ten (10) hours to present their case, including 24 opening statements and closing arguments. The Court shall reserve 30 minutes for each side for 25 closing arguments. The parties shall receive daily timesheets advising of the time remaining. Any 26 concerns must be raised immediately or will be waived. 27 3. Standard Motions in Limine: The Court hereby orders that: (a) witnesses shall be 1 settlement discussions, mediation, or insurance; and (c) there shall be no reference to or evidence 2 presented of wealth or lack thereof of any party except in the punitive damage phase of a case, to 3 the extent it exists. 4 4. Parties are ordered to admonish witnesses of the Court’s rulings. Failure to comply 5 with a ruling by the Court may result in sanctions, including without limitation the striking of the 6 witness’s entire testimony. 7 5. Doe Defendants: All Doe Defendants will be deemed dismissed once the jury, or 8 first witness, is sworn, whichever occurs first. 9 6. Depositions to be Used at Trial: Any party intending to use a deposition 10 transcript at trial for any purpose shall lodge the signed original (or a certified/stipulated copy if, 11 for any reason, the original is not available) for use by the Court and shall have extra copies 12 available for use by the questioning lawyer and the witness. All other parties are expected to have 13 their own copies available. The parties shall each prepare and provide an index of the lodged 14 transcripts and shall review the same with the courtroom deputy upon lodging the transcripts. The 15 index shall provide a space for the party and the courtroom deputy to confirm delivery of and 16 receipt of each transcript. Delivery of the transcripts shall occur no later than August 1, 2025. 17 7. Before each trial day, counsel shall confer with the courtroom deputy and identify 18 which of the transcripts may be used that day. 19 8. Witnesses at Trial: The party presenting evidence shall give the other party 24 20 hours written notice of the witnesses to be called unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties 21 themselves. In the event necessary, for witnesses on a Monday, written notice shall be provided 22 by the prior Saturday at noon. The parties are admonished that use of trial time is critical given 23 the limited resources of the Court. All parties must have witnesses ready and available to testify. 24 If the party presenting evidence does not have a witness ready to be called once a prior witness 25 steps down, that party may be deemed to have rested its case. Further, and as will be explained, 26 one’s time allocation does not stop while waiting for witnesses to arrive in Court. Witnesses may 27 be taken out of order upon stipulation or with leave of Court provided that the circumstances 1 the Court. 2 9. Objections: There shall be no “speaking objections,” and no rebuttal unless 3 requested by the Court, in which case it shall be brief—e.g., “hearsay,” and if a rebuttal requested, 4 “not offered for the truth.” If either counsel needs to make a better record, he/she may do so when 5 the jury is out at the next break. 6 10. Jurors and Peremptory Challenges: The Court will seat a total of eight (8) jurors 7 and no alternates. The Court sets the number of peremptory challenges at three (3). Motions 8 under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) for improper use of challenges must be made in a 9 timely fashion. Argument on the same shall be made outside the presence of the jury panel. The 10 Court will conduct the voir dire but will allow each side fifteen minutes for follow-up. 11 11. In accordance with Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.5(b) and Formal 12 Opinion 466, the parties “may review a juror’s or potential juror’s Internet presence, which may 13 include postings by the juror or potential juror in advance of and during the trial, but . . . may not 14 communicate directly or through another with a juror or potential juror.” A party “may not, either 15 personally or through another, send an access request to a juror’s electronic social media. An 16 access request is a communication to a juror asking the juror for information that the juror has not 17 made public and that would not be the type of ex parte communication prohibited by Model 18 Rule 3.5(b).” Further, to the extent that a party asks any follow-up questions to a prospective juror 19 during voir dire regarding information obtained from the review, the party shall disclose the 20 review to the juror. 21 12. Jury Questions: The Court allows written jury questions which it will share with 22 counsel at the break(s) and then place in the record. 23 13. Punitive Damages: If the jury will be asked to consider punitive damages, the 24 following additional orders apply: 25 a. Any party against whom punitive damages are sought shall have all relevant 26 financial data in Court in a sealed envelope once trial begins; 27 b. Counsel shall have all witnesses who will be called to testify regarding the 1 documents, etc.) available on 15-minutes notice once jury deliberations 2 begin; and 3 c. The parties shall meet and confer regarding written stipulations to 4 streamline this phase of the case. 5 14. Requests for Transcripts: If transcripts will be requested during or immediately 6 after the trial, arrangements must be made with the Court Reporter Coordinator (Telephone 7 No. 510-637-3534) at least two weeks prior to the commencement of jury selection. See 8 https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/about/clerks-office/transcripts-court-reporters. 9 15. Settlement: Counsel shall promptly notify the Court by phone and email (for after 10 hours, use: ygrchambers@cand.uscourts.gov) of any settlement. The notification shall indicate 11 what further steps need to be taken to finalize the settlement. Unless the Court receives notice of 12 settlement by 4:00 p.m. on the Friday prior to the Monday trial, jury costs will be assessed where 13 the parties do not proceed to trial as scheduled. Civ. L.R. 40-1. Parties are advised that the trial 14 and all trial-related dates will not be vacated until a formal Notice of Settlement is filed. 15 16. Trial Decorum and Procedure: Counsel, parties, and witnesses are expected to 16 conduct themselves at all times—on or off the record and whether or not in the presence of a 17 jury—in a professional and courteous manner during trial. Do NOT approach other parties’ 18 witnesses without permission. You may approach your own non-hostile witnesses without 19 permission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Habr v. RXMAPPER, LLC, (N.D. Cal. 2025).

Habr v. RXMAPPER, LLC (Habr v. RXMAPPER, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)