Habitat for Humanity v. Charity Lynn Rush
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 16-0757 Filed September 12, 2018
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CHARITY LYNN RUSH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Paul L. Macek, Judge.
Property owner appeals the district court’s decree foreclosing the
mortgages on the property in question. AFFIRMED.
Charity Murray, Davenport, pro se appellant.
Steven L. Nelson of Califf & Harper, PC, Moline, Illinois, for appellee.
Considered by Doyle, P.J., Mullins, J., and Mahan, S.J.*
*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2018). 2
MAHAN, Senior Judge.
Habitat for Humanity—Quad Cities built a house for Charity Rush in 2002,
and Rush executed promissory notes secured by mortgages for the property.
Rush defaulted on the notes in mid-2014. She made her last payment in June
2015, which fulfilled the August 2014 payment. Habitat for Humanity filed a
foreclosure action in equity, electing to foreclose without redemption. Following
trial, the district court entered a decree foreclosing the mortgages.
Rush appeals the court’s foreclosure decree, raising several challenges to
the court’s ruling, essentially claiming “a loan was never given,” the mortgages
provided to her by Habitat for Humanity were “fraudulent,” and she “has the right
to rescind her signatures and revoke all contracts created out of fraud.” After
reviewing the record in this case, including the briefs and arguments of the parties
on appeal, we conclude the district court properly rendered a judgment of
foreclosure. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s decree without further opinion. See
Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(a), (d), (e).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Habitat for Humanity v. Charity Lynn Rush (Habitat for Humanity v. Charity Lynn Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.