Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham

141 A.3d 937, 166 Conn. App. 399, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 269
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJune 21, 2016
DocketNo. 37940.
StatusPublished

This text of 141 A.3d 937 (Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham, 141 A.3d 937, 166 Conn. App. 399, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 269 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

*938PER CURIAM.

*400The defendant Kim Lanham appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered by the trial court, in favor of the plaintiff, Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield County, Inc. After reviewing and considering the record in this case, including the briefs and arguments of the parties on appeal, we conclude that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure. There is no error.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of setting new law days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 A.3d 937, 166 Conn. App. 399, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/habitat-for-humanity-of-coastal-fairfield-cnty-inc-v-lanham-connappct-2016.