Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham

141 A.3d 937, 166 Conn. App. 399, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 269
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 21, 2016·No. No. 37940.·Published

Opinion

*938PER CURIAM.

*400The defendant Kim Lanham appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered by the trial court, in favor of the plaintiff, Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield County, Inc. After reviewing and considering the record in this case, including the briefs and arguments of the parties on appeal, we conclude that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure. There is no error.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of setting new law days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham, 141 A.3d 937, 166 Conn. App. 399, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 269 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).

141 A.3d 937 (Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.