Haberstro v. Scholl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haberstro v. Scholl

213 A.D.2d 1082, 625 N.Y.S.2d 969

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1995·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner failed to submit a verified petition at the time of filing the order to show cause. A verified petition is a jurisdictional condition precedent to commencement of a special proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-116 and CPLR 304 (see, Matter of Zicari v Stewart, 207 AD2d 951; see also, Matter of Goodman v Hayduk, 45 NY2d 804; Matter of Callahan v Russo, 123 AD2d 518). Furthermore, the record does not reflect that a verified petition has ever been filed with the Clerk of the Court in the County of Erie. (Appeal from Order of. Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—Election Law.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Mar. 8,1995.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner failed to submit a verified petition at the time of filing the order to show cause. A verified petition is a jurisdictional condition precedent to commencement of a special proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-116 and CPLR 304 (see, Matter of Zicari v Stewart, 207 AD2d 951; see also, Matter of Goodman v Hayduk, 45 NY2d 804; Matter of Callahan v Russo, 123 AD2d 518). Furthermore, the record does not reflect that a verified petition has ever been filed with the Clerk of the Court in the County of Erie. (Appeal from Order of. Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—Election Law.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Mar. 8,1995.)

Haberstro v. Scholl, 213 A.D.2d 1082, 625 N.Y.S.2d 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

213 A.D.2d 1082 (Haberstro v. Scholl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related