Habersham Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marcin
Opinion
Appellant’s motion to intervene in a pending proceeding was originally granted below. Subsequently, upon reconsideration, the tried court vacated its order and denied appellant’s motion. This appeal follows.
“Since there has been no express determination of no just reason [892]*892for delay or direction that the order is final, providing for immediate appeal, or the issuance of a certificate as provided for by [Code § 6-701 (a) (2)], the appeal in this case is premature.” American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. v. Moore, 120 Ga. App. 624, 625 (171 SE2d 751) (1969). The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed. Henderson v. Atlanta Transit System, 233 Ga. 82 (210 SE2d 4) (1974).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
276 S.E.2d 63 (Habersham Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marcin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.