Haberl v. 21st Mortgage Corp.

138 So. 3d 1192, 2014 WL 2130283, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7813
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 2014
DocketNo. 5D12-4839
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 So. 3d 1192 (Haberl v. 21st Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haberl v. 21st Mortgage Corp., 138 So. 3d 1192, 2014 WL 2130283, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7813 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joann Haberl appeals a summary final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of 21st Mortgage Corporation. Because the notice of default attached to the affidavit in support of 21st Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment does not comply with the pre-acceleration notice requirements set forth in paragraph 22 of the mortgage,1 we reverse the summary final judgment of [1193]*1193foreclosure and remand for further proceedings. See Samaroo v. Wells Fargo Bank, 137 So.3d 1127, 2014 WL 1255428, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D670 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 28, 2014) (summary final judgment of foreclosure reversed where default letter that mortgagee sent to mortgagors failed to satisfy the pre-acceleration notice requirement of the mortgage as a condition precedent to foreclosure).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of New York Mellon v. Nunez and Valdes
180 So. 3d 160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 3d 1192, 2014 WL 2130283, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haberl-v-21st-mortgage-corp-fladistctapp-2014.