Haberfeld v. Mayer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Haberfeld v. Mayer

100 A. 587, 256 Pa. 151, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 579

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 8, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 75

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 100 A. 587 (Haberfeld v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haberfeld v. Mayer, 100 A. 587, 256 Pa. 151, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 579 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was a feigned issue to determine whether the plaintiff or defendant in it was entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy paid into court by the insurance company which had issued it. The jury were directed to find for the plaintiff, and properly so for the reasons appearing in the opinion of the learned court below overruling the motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This was a feigned issue to determine whether the plaintiff or defendant in it was entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy paid into court by the insurance company which had issued it. The jury were directed to find for the plaintiff, and properly so for the reasons appearing in the opinion of the learned court below overruling the motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A. 587, 256 Pa. 151, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haberfeld-v-mayer-pa-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack