Haber v. Town of Ramapo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haber v. Town of Ramapo

61 A.D.2d 1007, 402 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10634

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 1007 (Haber v. Town of Ramapo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haber v. Town of Ramapo, 61 A.D.2d 1007, 402 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding by a Town of Ramapo police officer pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Police Commissioners of the Town of Ramapo, dated August 23, 1976, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of the specification that he had failed to interview a complainant in the course of a police assignment, and imposed a suspension without pay for a period of seven days. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. There was substantial evidence to support the finding and the punishment was not unduly severe (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding by a Town of Ramapo police officer pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Police Commissioners of the Town of Ramapo, dated August 23, 1976, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of the specification that he had failed to interview a complainant in the course of a police assignment, and imposed a suspension without pay for a period of seven days. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. There was substantial evidence to support the finding and the punishment was not unduly severe (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 1007, 402 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haber-v-town-of-ramapo-nyappdiv-1978.