Haber v. Kinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haber v. Kinney

245 A.D. 749

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 749 (Haber v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haber v. Kinney, 245 A.D. 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution, judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order herein plaintiff stipulate to reduce to $2,500 the amount of the verdict rendered in her favor, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict was excessive. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution, judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order herein plaintiff stipulate to reduce to $2,500 the amount of the verdict rendered in her favor, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict was excessive. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haber-v-kinney-nyappdiv-1935.