Haber v. Cross County Hospital

42 A.D.2d 700, 346 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3927
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haber v. Cross County Hospital. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 A.D.2d 885

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Rae Haber and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by her husband, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 26, 1972, which denied their renewed motion for a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403. Order reversed, and renewed motion granted, with $20 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff Rae Haber is now 73 years of age and the unrefuted medical proof indicates with a reasonable degree of medical certainty” that she is unlikely to survive the normal delay to be expected before this type of action reaches trial. Under these circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur. 12 Max v. First Westchester National Bank

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haber v. Cross County Hospital, 42 A.D.2d 700, 346 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

42 A.D.2d 700 (Haber v. Cross County Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.