Habel v. State (In re Habel)

268 So. 3d 661
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedAugust 10, 2018
Docket1170823
StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 661 (Habel v. State (In re Habel)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Habel v. State (In re Habel), 268 So. 3d 661 (Ala. 2018).

Opinion

BRYAN, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Stuart, C.J., and Parker, Main, and Mendheim, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 So. 3d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/habel-v-state-in-re-habel-ala-2018.