Haase v. Bishop Jonathan G. Sherman Episcopal Nursing Home

62 A.D.3d 948, 878 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2009 NY Slip Op 4194, 2009 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4759

This text of 62 A.D.3d 948 (Haase v. Bishop Jonathan G. Sherman Episcopal Nursing Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haase v. Bishop Jonathan G. Sherman Episcopal Nursing Home, 62 A.D.3d 948, 878 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2009 NY Slip Op 4194, 2009 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated December 13, 2007, which granted the motion of the defendants Bishop Jonathan G. Sherman Episcopal Nursing Home, also known as Bishop Sherman Nursing Home, St. John’s Episcopal Hospital, Episcopal Health Services, Inc., and Church Charity Foundation of Long Island, also known as Church Charity Foundation, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court correctly granted the motion of the defendants Bishop Jonathan G. Sherman Episcopal Nursing Home, also known as Bishop Sherman Nursing Home, St. John’s Episcopal Hospital, Episcopal Health Services, Inc., and Church Charity Foundation of Long Island, also known as Church Charity Foundation, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. In support of their motion, the moving defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324-325 [1986]; Wechter v Kelner, 40 AD3d 747, 748 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiffs speculative and conclusory assertions failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Daleo v James, 52 AD3d 766, 767 [2008]; Vitale v Levine, 44 AD3d 935, 936 [2007]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Wechter v. Kelner
40 A.D.3d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Vitale v. Levine
44 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Daleo v. James
52 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.D.3d 948, 878 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2009 NY Slip Op 4194, 2009 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haase-v-bishop-jonathan-g-sherman-episcopal-nursing-home-nyappdiv-2009.