Haas v. Zephyr Springs Golf Club, L.P. ex rel. International Golf Group, Inc.
This text of 684 So. 2d 231 (Haas v. Zephyr Springs Golf Club, L.P. ex rel. International Golf Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Appellants challenge a temporary injunction, arguing that the Appellees failed to show an irreparable injury or a threat to public safety. We agree and reverse. The trial court found insufficient evidence of an irreparable harm but entered the injunction based on a threat to public safety. After examining the record, we conclude that the evidence failed to demonstrate a public safety threat that would justify injunctive relief. Cf. Martin v. Pinellas County, 444 So.2d 489, 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (record “replete” with evidence that justified injunction based on public danger posed by pollutants on Martin’s property that would contaminate the aquifer), review denied, 451 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 So. 2d 231, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12429, 1996 WL 673339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haas-v-zephyr-springs-golf-club-lp-ex-rel-international-golf-group-fladistctapp-1996.