Haas v. Teters

106 P. 305, 17 Idaho 550, 1910 Ida. LEXIS 109
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 106 P. 305 (Haas v. Teters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haas v. Teters, 106 P. 305, 17 Idaho 550, 1910 Ida. LEXIS 109 (Idaho 1910).

Opinion

SULLIVAN, C. J.

— Respondent moves to dismiss tbe appeal on tbe ground, among other things, that the undertaking was not filed within five days after the notice of appeal was served on the attorney for the adverse party, as provided by sec. 4808, Rev. Codes.

It appears from the record that the notice of appeal was served on the 12th day of'October, 1909, and the undertaking was not filed with the clerk of the proper court until the the 22d day of October, 1909, making ten days between the service of the notice of appeal and the filing of the undertaking. Under the provisions of said section of the statute, the undertaking must be filed within five days after the notice of appeal is served upon the adverse party or his attorney, or the appeal is ineffectual for any purpose. As the undertaking was not filed until ten days after the notice of appeal was served, the motion must be granted, and it is so ordered. (Cole v. Fox, 13 Ida. 123, 88 Pac. 561; West v. Dygert, 13 Ida. 641, 92 Pac. 753; Village of Hailey v. Riley, 13 Ida. 749, 92 Pac. 756.)

Costs are awarded to respondent.

Stewart and Ailshie, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myers v. Harvey
229 P. 1112 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1924)
Kimzey v. Highland Livestock & Land Co.
214 P. 750 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)
Kingsbury v. Lee
211 P. 552 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1922)
Woodmansee & Webster Co. v. Woodmansee
176 P. 148 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 P. 305, 17 Idaho 550, 1910 Ida. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haas-v-teters-idaho-1910.