Haas v. Stenger

75 Ill. 597
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There is no question of law worthy of consideration presented by this record. The matter of allowing new pleas to be filed, under the circumstances of this case, is purely discretionary. Hpon the facts there was a conflict of testimony. That was for the jury to pass upon, and we see no reason for interfering with their finding. The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haas v. Stenger, 75 Ill. 597 (Ill. 1874).

75 Ill. 597 (Haas v. Stenger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierpont v. Johnson
104 Ill. App. 27 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)