Home/Supreme Court/Haas v. Palace Hotel Co.

Haas v. Palace Hotel Co.

342 U.S. 813, 72 S. Ct. 28, 96 L. Ed. 615, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1563
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 8, 1951
DocketNo. 51
StatusPublished

This text of 342 U.S. 813 (Haas v. Palace Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haas v. Palace Hotel Co., 342 U.S. 813, 72 S. Ct. 28, 96 L. Ed. 615, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1563 (1951).

Opinion

District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. [814]*814■Certiorari denied.'

Roger Kent for petitioner. Lyman Henry for the Palace Hotel Co.; and Farnham P. Griffiths and Morris M. Doyle for the Bank of California et al., respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 U.S. 813, 72 S. Ct. 28, 96 L. Ed. 615, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haas-v-palace-hotel-co-scotus-1951.