Haas v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haas v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

42 N.Y.S. 302, 11 A.D. 625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 42 N.Y.S. 302 (Haas v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haas v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 42 N.Y.S. 302, 11 A.D. 625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was testimony in this case which permitted the jury to find that the horse which was killed escaped from the pasture lot onto the railroad tracks through an opening in the fence, which existed through the negligence of the defendant; and we must assume from the verdict that the jury did so find. In this view of the case the fact that the horse was killed by a train - of the Ontario & Western Railroad Company does not appear to be material, and it was not error by the court to so charge the jury. No other question requires consideration.

The judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There was testimony in this case which permitted the jury to find that the horse which was killed escaped from the pasture lot onto the railroad tracks through an opening in the fence, which existed through the negligence of the defendant; and we must assume from the verdict that the jury did so find. In this view of the case the fact that the horse was killed by a train - of the Ontario & Western Railroad Company does not appear to be material, and it was not error by the court to so charge the jury. No other question requires consideration.

The judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 N.Y.S. 302, 11 A.D. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haas-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1896.