Haas v. McGrath

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haas v. McGrath

513 S.W.3d 386, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2017 WL 976032

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 2017·No. No. ED 103961·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael J. Haas appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment (“Judgment”) granting a motion for directed verdict for Thomas W. McGrath, sued individually and in his capacity as trustee, and entering Judgment in his favor.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Judgment was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael J. Haas appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment (“Judgment”) granting a motion for directed verdict for Thomas W. McGrath, sued individually and in his capacity as trustee, and entering Judgment in his favor.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Judgment was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Haas v. McGrath, 513 S.W.3d 386, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2017 WL 976032 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

513 S.W.3d 386 (Haas v. McGrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.