Haas v. Ketcham

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Haas v. Ketcham

87 N.Y.S. 411

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.Y.S. 411 (Haas v. Ketcham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haas v. Ketcham, 87 N.Y.S. 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

There was no proof in this case ot eviction actual or constructive. if the assault committed by the boy upon the defendant could be imputed to- the landlord, still this single act would not constitute such an interference with the beneficial use and possession of the demised premises as to amount to an eviction. The assault in no way related to or affected the defendant’s possession.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

There was no proof in this case ot eviction actual or constructive. if the assault committed by the boy upon the defendant could be imputed to- the landlord, still this single act would not constitute such an interference with the beneficial use and possession of the demised premises as to amount to an eviction. The assault in no way related to or affected the defendant’s possession.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.Y.S. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haas-v-ketcham-nyappterm-1904.