Haas v. Costigan
179 N.E.2d 513, 10 N.Y.2d 889
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. We concur in the result reached by the Appellate Division. No opinion.
Concur: Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster, Williams
Designated pursuant to section 5 of article VI of the State Constitution in the temporary absence of Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Fuld.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haas v. Costigan, 179 N.E.2d 513, 10 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. 1961).
179 N.E.2d 513 (Haas v. Costigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Thurston v. Gates
2025 NY Slip Op 31624(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Matter of Toles v. Quintana
2020 NY Slip Op 2751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Adams v. Klapper
182 Misc. 2d 51 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Previdi v. Matthews
186 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Kogan v. D'Angelo
83 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Signorelli v. Feuer
57 A.D.2d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Acosta v. Previte
51 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)