Haas v. Bent & Johnson

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 29, 1996·No. 96-1027·Unpublished

Opinion

May 29, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 96-1027

JOSEPH SANDERS HAAS, JR., ETC., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

BENT & JOHNSON, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Joseph S. Haas, Jr. on brief pro se.

Per Curiam. The action was properly dismissed for

lack of federal jurisdiction. Complete diversity did not

exist and plaintiff stated no federal claim.

Affirmed.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haas v. Bent & Johnson, (1st Cir. 1996).

Haas v. Bent & Johnson (Haas v. Bent & Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.