Haarup v. Haarup
198 S.W.3d 654, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1239, 2006 WL 2403246
Opinion
ORDER
Paul Haarup (Father) appeals from the judgment denying his motion to modify custody with regard to his daughter, Brit-ny. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haarup v. Haarup, 198 S.W.3d 654, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1239, 2006 WL 2403246 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
198 S.W.3d 654 (Haarup v. Haarup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilmore v. Lawler
198 S.W.3d 654 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)