Haarstick v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry.
133 F. 1020, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4482
This text of 133 F. 1020 (Haarstick v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haarstick v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry., 133 F. 1020, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4482 (7th Cir. 1904).
Opinion
This case is ruled by the case of James Taussig, plaintiff in error, v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Railway (just decided) 133 Fed. 220. The decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taussig v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry.
133 F. 220 (Seventh Circuit, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 F. 1020, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haarstick-v-st-louis-valley-transfer-ry-ca7-1904.