Haarstick v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry.
133 F. 1020, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4482
Opinion
This case is ruled by the case of James Taussig, plaintiff in error, v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Railway (just decided) 133 Fed. 220. The decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haarstick v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry., 133 F. 1020, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4482 (7th Cir. 1904).
133 F. 1020 (Haarstick v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taussig v. St. Louis Valley Transfer Ry.
133 F. 220 (Seventh Circuit, 1904)