Haarmann De Laire-Schaefer Co. v. Lueders
This text of 145 F. 357 (Haarmann De Laire-Schaefer Co. v. Lueders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The patent in suit contains four claims, but claim 1 only is in suit. I think title in complainant is shown. Iiifringement must be proved; it is not presumed and the evidence ought to be satisfactory to the trial court. In this case I appreciate the difficulties under which complainants labored, but am far from convinced that defendants have infringed. I also doubt the validity of the patent, but will not pass on that point. Assuming it to be valid, infringemént is not shown.
« The defendants are entitled to a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 F. 357, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haarmann-de-laire-schaefer-co-v-lueders-circtsdny-1906.