Haarmann De Laire-Schaefer Co. v. Lueders

145 F. 357, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4761
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 27, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RAY, District Judge.

The patent in suit contains four claims, but claim 1 only is in suit. I think title in complainant is shown. Iiifringement must be proved; it is not presumed and the evidence ought to be satisfactory to the trial court. In this case I appreciate the difficulties under which complainants labored, but am far from convinced that defendants have infringed. I also doubt the validity of the patent, but will not pass on that point. Assuming it to be valid, infringemént is not shown.

« The defendants are entitled to a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haarmann De Laire-Schaefer Co. v. Lueders, 145 F. 357, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4761 (circtsdny 1906).

145 F. 357 (Haarmann De Laire-Schaefer Co. v. Lueders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. One Case Chemical Compound
203 F. 63 (S.D. New York, 1913)