Haar v. . Schloss
83 S.E. 306, 168 N.C. 97, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 18
This text of 83 S.E. 306 (Haar v. . Schloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haar v. . Schloss, 83 S.E. 306, 168 N.C. 97, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 18 (N.C. 1914).
Opinion
It appearing from an inspection of the record that it is necessary for the heirs at law of Mary Christ to be made parties in this action, in order that an adjudication binding upon all persons interested in the land shall be made, it is ordered that the action be remanded, to the end that said heirs be made parties.
Eemanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bethune v. New York Underwriters Ins.
98 F. Supp. 366 (E.D. South Carolina, 1951)
Murdaugh v. Traders & Mechanics Ins. Co.
62 S.E.2d 723 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 306, 168 N.C. 97, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haar-v-schloss-nc-1914.