Haaland v. Florida Telephone Corp.
This text of 38 Fla. Supp. 170 (Haaland v. Florida Telephone Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lake County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. TROY HALL, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This cause being before the court upon the plaintiff’s motion to amend, the court having heard argument of counsel and counsel having favored the court with written memorandum briefs in support of their respective positions; the court having reviewed the case record, considered the able arguments and well researched briefs of counsel and being duly advised in the premises, finds that the motion to amend should be granted.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the plaintiff’s motion to amend is granted.
It is further ordered that the other parties to the cause shall have thirty days from the filing of this order in which to plead further as they may be advised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Fla. Supp. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haaland-v-florida-telephone-corp-flacirct5lak-1973.