Haaland v. Florida Telephone Corp.

Lake County Circuit Court

Haaland v. Florida Telephone Corp.

38 Fla. Supp. 170

Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lake County·Decided February 23, 1973·No. No. 71-7625·Published

Opinion

W. TROY HALL, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This cause being before the court upon the plaintiff’s motion to amend, the court having heard argument of counsel and counsel having favored the court with written memorandum briefs in support of their respective positions; the court having reviewed the case record, considered the able arguments and well researched briefs of counsel and being duly advised in the premises, finds that the motion to amend should be granted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the plaintiff’s motion to amend is granted.

It is further ordered that the other parties to the cause shall have thirty days from the filing of this order in which to plead further as they may be advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. TROY HALL, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This cause being before the court upon the plaintiff’s motion to amend, the court having heard argument of counsel and counsel having favored the court with written memorandum briefs in support of their respective positions; the court having reviewed the case record, considered the able arguments and well researched briefs of counsel and being duly advised in the premises, finds that the motion to amend should be granted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the plaintiff’s motion to amend is granted.

It is further ordered that the other parties to the cause shall have thirty days from the filing of this order in which to plead further as they may be advised.

Haaland v. Florida Telephone Corp., 38 Fla. Supp. 170 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1973).

Pincite

38 Fla. Supp. 170 (Haaland v. Florida Telephone Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.