Haak v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.

162 A.D. 928

This text of 162 A.D. 928 (Haak v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haak v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co., 162 A.D. 928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and dis[929]*929bursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented; Foote, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A.D. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haak-v-buffalo-rochester-pittsburgh-railway-co-nyappdiv-1914.