Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.

60 A. 515, 70 N.J.L. 624, 41 Vroom 624, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 212

DecidedFebruary 23, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A. 515 (Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co., 60 A. 515, 70 N.J.L. 624, 41 Vroom 624, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 212 (N.J. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Pur Curiam.

Tlie record before us consists of a state of demand, transcript of short-hand notes of testimony, a motion by the defendant for direction of a verdict at the close of the case, a refusal and the charge of the judge, all in a District Court. There is no verdict, no judgment, no state of the case agreed upon or slated, no appeal. The counsel for appellant, in his brief, says “the rule to show cause should be made absolute.” Rules to show cause in cases tried in the District Courts cannot be brought before this court by appeal.

The appeal will be dismissed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pur Curiam.

Tlie record before us consists of a state of demand, transcript of short-hand notes of testimony, a motion by the defendant for direction of a verdict at the close of the case, a refusal and the charge of the judge, all in a District Court. There is no verdict, no judgment, no state of the case agreed upon or slated, no appeal. The counsel for appellant, in his brief, says “the rule to show cause should be made absolute.” Rules to show cause in cases tried in the District Courts cannot be brought before this court by appeal.

The appeal will be dismissed:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A. 515, 70 N.J.L. 624, 41 Vroom 624, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haag-v-elizabeth-plainfield-central-jersey-railway-co-nj-1904.