Haag v. Deter
This text of 78 N.E. 331 (Haag v. Deter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the court below appellee recovered a joint judgment against appellant and one Enyart, and from [127]*127said judgment appellant seeks to prosecute a vacation appeal. Notice has been served on Enyart, but he has not been named as a party in the assignment of errors. Appellee makes this point, and insists on a dismissal of the appeal. Rule six of this court requires that “the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of all the parties,” and under the settled practice this appeal must be dismissed. Elliott, App. Proc., §323; Ewbank’s Manual, §126.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 N.E. 331, 167 Ind. 126, 1906 Ind. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haag-v-deter-ind-1906.