H & W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman

30 F. App'x 75
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2002·No. 01-2425·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*76 PER CURIAM.

Lewis Sehulman appeals from the district court’s order declining to reconsider the denial of Schulman’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. H & W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman, No. CA-98-3851-CCB (D.Md. July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H & W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman, 30 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2002).

30 F. App'x 75 (H & W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related