H v. T
208 Pa. 233
Opinion
On the handing up of the paper-books in the above case the court of its own motion, calling attention to the fact that the statement of the question involved was two pages in length, in violation of Rule 26, suppressed the paper-book and nonprossed the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
H v. T, 208 Pa. 233 (Pa. 1904).
208 Pa. 233 (H v. T) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McMellen v. Williamson
32 Pa. Super. 263 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)