H. v. Battelle

Missouri Court of Appeals

H. v. Battelle

835 S.W.2d 403, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 925

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1992·No. No. 61340·Published

Opinion

[404]*404ORDER

Defendant Fisher appeals from a judgment ordering him to expunge plaintiffs arrest record. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[404]*404ORDER

Defendant Fisher appeals from a judgment ordering him to expunge plaintiffs arrest record. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

H. v. Battelle, 835 S.W.2d 403, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

835 S.W.2d 403 (H. v. Battelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.