H. T. Mahoney v. United States of America, Defendent-Appellee. Ruby Thelma Loftis Pierce, Etc. v. United States
This text of 339 F.2d 605 (H. T. Mahoney v. United States of America, Defendent-Appellee. Ruby Thelma Loftis Pierce, Etc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
339 F.2d 605
H. T. MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendent-Appellee.
Ruby Thelma Loftis PIERCE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15819.
No. 15820.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
December 17, 1964.
H. Calvin Walter, Knoxville, Tenn., Walter, Gilbertson & Claiborne, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, for appellants.
J. F. Bishop, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., John H. Reddy, U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
These appeals came on to be heard and were submitted to the Court on oral arguments, briefs and records.
The issues raised are largely factual in nature and received careful consideration in the District Court. We think there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the District Judge and they are not clearly erroneous.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons and upon the ground set forth in the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Robert L. Taylor, reported in 220 F.Supp. 823.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
339 F.2d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-t-mahoney-v-united-states-of-america-defendent-appellee-ruby-thelma-ca6-1964.